I've been reading Robert Scholes's
The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English as a Discipline. I'm glad I finally got around to reading this text. Scholes argues for resituating English curriculum, especially general education core classes, around issues of textuality. He argues,
We need speaking and listening skills, to be sure, and we need to be literate in the traditional sense: able to read and write. But we also need to be "literate" across a various and complex network of different kinds of writing and various media of communication (130).
A couple issues have been in the back of my mind while reading this. This year, the Composition Committee will be taking a look at the College Composition curriculum in order to update/revise it. The question is: what principles and assumptions about literacy and the purpose of composition are we using currently? To what degree is our teaching relevant to today's world? That is, I am thinking about why we do what we do, who we serve, and toward what ends. Scholes is giving me some things to think about. In particular, Scholes gives us the following definition of literacy:
Literacy involves the ability to understand and to produce a wide variety of texts that use the English language--including work in traditional literary forms, in the practical and persuasive forms, and in the modern media as well. Whether students go on to higher education or enter the workforce after graduation, their success will depend to a great extent on their ability to understand and use the English language. That is why this course [a high school capstone course in English Studies] makes language itself--and its use in various forms, genres, and media--the center of attention (130, brackets mine).
Yes, Scholes is writing about a high school senior English course he helped develop for the College Boards with high school teachers around the country called "Pacesetter English." But his definition of literacy as something broader than "academic writing" or "good prose" interests me. It also makes me think that one of the things that is important to do when planning a course is to ask ourselves what assumptions we are making about literacy and the purpose of College Composition.
These are very provisional thoughts...and one's that make me want to get back to reading Pegeen Reichert Powell's, "Critical Discourse Analysis and Composition Studies," since she has bit of a different take, although still very interested in the assumptions and purposes of comp. And there's also that article from the New London Group, "Multiliteracies," that is quite useful. Both are on
eReserve, by the way.
Kevin